










![]() | ![]() | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
Recently, a good friend of mine called to inquire about hiring the agency for which I work. The fellow's a sharp entrepreneur, and one of his start-ups had taken off. He was ready to invest in a solid marketing program to keep the momentum going. This dear fellow suffers from an unfortunate ailment I've been aware of for some time, though it took this incident for me to attach a diagnostic name to it. Here, then, I was observing a classic case of the Starbucks Napkin Syndrome. Other warning signs of SNS include a belief that conceiving and executing marketing and pr strategies is something that's easy—an afterthought, really—and that all such work is pretty much common sense. SNS sufferers also maintain that we marketers are only being hired because the brass doesn't have enough time to deal with a marketing task that, of course, he or anyone can do. Even worse, the executive with SNS will simply act on his convictions: "We need a press release," he'll say. "So have Jim in Finance throw something together. No, better yet, have the intern do it. He doesn't look too busy." As bewildering as that scenario may seem to a marketing professional, I've seen it acted out before my eyes. Few other business decisions are made on the fly, or with so little input and expertise, as are ones involving pr. I've yet to see a company treat other key business issues—like, say, paying taxes—with such ambivalence. Can you imagine hearing a CFO say: "My Aunt Betsy was pretty good at math in high school; let's have her do our quarterly." And yet the marketing equivalent of this reasoning takes place every day. Why is it, I wondered, that the marketing profession is the one business discipline assumed to be devoid of complexity? My ruminations were painful; I was still stinging from the actions of another client the same morning I got the line about the napkin. Plummeting stock prices and the resignation of a CEO plagued the company in question, which had issued a press release that I found in my in-box after returning from Starbucks. The release broke every rule in the book, from AP style violations to corporate-speak quotes that only made the management look weak and clueless. Nobody had contacted my firm for guidance. A Google News search confirmed that the release had already hit the wires. Damage done. (And, needless to say, here was a textbook case of SNS.) Later, as I was getting ready to leave for Thanksgiving, the phone rang. It was a potential new client who was launching a business in Cleveland. He told me that advertising was too expensive, so he wanted "free ink." Sure, guy, I'll just order you some! Was that the Wall Street Journal or Newsweek that you wanted? He was—you guessed it—yet another SNS sufferer. And, as I have with the rest of them, I will have to educate him. Yes, I'll say, we can probably get your start-up some initial press—but there's a lot more to good pr and identity building than just that. Which brings me to the good news: SNS can be effectively treated, even cured. Unfortunately, it's most always up to we in the marketing and pr profession to administer the treatment. That goes by another term: education. There remain throngs of co-workers, clients and management still desperately needing to understand what pr is and what it can do for them. To all of you non-marketing people in management roles who might be reading this: Please scoot over a bit because my colleagues need a seat at your strategy meetings. Companies refusing us a chair do so at their own peril; firms operating in a communications vacuum will eventually lose complete control over their messages and their brands. Especially in this era, in which consumers are storming the corporate gates and knocking down the once-sturdy walls constructed from antiquated methods of top-down message control, with the Internet and other new technologies being the consumers' battering ram of choice. But that's enough SNS curing from me for today. My coffee's about gone—and it seems I've run out of room to write on this napkin. | |||||||
Any contributed content above is the subjective opinion of that member or external author, and not of Gooruze.com Pty Ltd. View our House Rules for more details. | |||||||
Related Articles![]() No related articles available | Bookmarks![]() No bookmarks available | ||||||
Related keywords: management, public, relations, starbucks-napkin-syndrome | |||||||
| ARTICLE RATING | |||||||
Thankyou for your vote (you can change your vote at any time). Please leave some helpful comments about this article using the box below. | |||||||
![]() Add a comment | |||||||
Add a comment on this article. | |||||||
![]() Comments | |||||||
February 7th Great diagnosis.
I wonder if the fact the napkin is from Starbucks adds to the illusions of grandeur? Reply
Report
January 12th What he said. It's amazing how little thought people give to strategy, message and marketing execution until their thoughtlessness blows up in their face! Ah well, at least here we can complain about it. :-)
Reply
Report
December 21st Great article!
I have worked in 2 seo/ppc agencies and would see it all the time. A client would call up and want to make a MAJOR immediate decision based on an article they read. In many cases the decision has been made and implemented. Only after the fact they would call and ask, "why isnt it working?" or even worse, "why did our site get banned?" Reply
Report
December 21st I agree. It is amazing how many clients freak out about these things...as well as people within a company if you do in-house SEM.
Reply
Report
November 21st I totally agree. When I first started consulting I thought it was me - "too young and a female" - a few grey hairs now I realise it just is what it is ..fortunately marketing is becoming more scientific but yes there'll always be SNS's and marketing is still not an exact science.
Reply
Report
November 21st Great article. But the real problem, which is probably what affects the brain of people with SNS, is that they're drinking the crap that Starbucks passes off as coffee. Get them to drink real java and their brain may think differently. On another note, in the US we've had about 50 years of marketing degrees, 30 years of direct marketing degrees, 10 years of digital/e-marketing/online/intereactive/internet marketing education courses, yet marketers still make the same mistakes. The average job tenure of most senior marketing people is less than two years. And it's because marketing is such a sloppy discipline when it comes to accountability - everyone's a marketing expert, just ask ther CEO's wife! Reply
Report
November 22nd Ha! Written with the tone of someone who has pitched advertising to a roomful of operation, finance and similar executives with only one marketer (and maybe the CEO) in the room for cover...
Reply
Report
February 26th Hey Malcolm, great insight. Is there any resource to the length of senior marketers and their roles?
Reply
Report
November 21st that's awesome, i am a big customer of starbucks however i am also a big believing in getting your marketing right :)
Reply
Report
November 21st Very cool, Vince, and a great lesson among the smiles. I will never admit in front of you that I once worked at a place that spent a day mired in meetings over building its own CRM system only to have four people break for dinner at the Macaroni Grill and sketch the design in crayon on their paper-covered tables.
Reply
Report
February 25th If you can't sell marketing to your own company or client, what kind of marketer are you? Read this if you have this problem. sherpa - How to Sell Good Marketing to Your CEO (2004) 39p.pdf http://www.sherpastore.com/Sell-Good-Marketing-to-CEO.html Reply
Report
| |||||||
Home | Read News | Post News | Read Articles | Write Articles | Q & A | Groups | Activity | Members | More
Privacy Policy | House Rules | About Us | Contact Us | House Blog | FAQ
© Copyright 2007 Gooruze ™ | Built by Market United