










![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tactical and Technical SEO |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I didn't see anything here dedicated to the more technical and strategic areas of SEO and Search so I started one. If you like to study search patents, testing out theories on the search engines or simply like to theorize about how search engines index, rank and evaluate web pages... then this would be the place for it. Do you have some great techniques to share? This would be the place as well.
From indexing and retrieval concepts to tactical link building - bring it on! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Blog posts 1-4 of 4 25 Oct Many times when I talk about technical SEO aspects and Patents in particular, many people try to glean more than is actually there. People often think that the way to 2 rnaking Nirvana is contained within these documents. I was talking about this the other day with a cohort and decided to post the conversation with some commentary; The Magic Bullet - a chat with Bill Slawski Reading technical aspects of search is very important - it's simply not a means to an end nor the path to salvation - the SEO caveat
23 Oct I made a post yesterday that was inspidred by some SEO folks that were asked what they felt the value proposition for SEO was; which is here I was interested in what anyone else felt; Here is my subsequent post with my thoughts on the Value of SEO How would YOU explain the value of SEO to the un-initiated?
18 Oct Ok so it appears Gypsy is seeing the same thing I am. I will admit hes the first person that has admitted seeing the same falling of link power that I have noticed over the past several months. "What seems painfully obvious these days is that the ever popular methodologies based upon link relationships (backlinks) or simple keyword density centric approaches in your SEO programs just aren’t everything they once were." (if you dont mind me quoting you) Something is def. up. The old days of moving right up the ladder, via backlinks are slowly passing. The ladder seems to be slippery then ever. Anyone else noticing this trend as of late, with Google especially.
18 Oct Ill start this off, since I didn't get a response in the other Q and A . Great to have you here Gypsy! I have always wondered the technicality behind this specific scenario: You have a site: www.furniturefactory.com You have lots of different kinds of furniture. Chairs, Desks, Tables etc. Your sight is also heavy with content on each page: www.furniturefactory.com/tables/blue_table.php www.furniturefactory.com/chairs/red_chair.php www.furniturefactory.com/desks/blue_desk.php So here in lies the goal. Increasing your ranking for your main landing page: www.furniturefactory.com/desks/blue_desk.php I have never tested this nor heard one way or the other but if your looking to use optimial interal linking which will increase www.peachfarm.com/desks/blue_desk.php 1. desks.furniturefactory.com/blue_desk_info.php OR: 2. www.furniturefactory.com/articles/blue_desk_info.php Keep in mind both pages have even more content, above and beyond the content found on the main landing page. The goal is to pass relevancy and weight through another section of relevant content on the site. Which facilitation you think will work better? Would the only benefit from the subdomain route be you could potentially get both: desks.furniturefactory.com/blue_desk_info.php www.furniturefactory.com/tables/blue_table.php indexed on the same front SERP? or does it pass link juice with this tactic as well.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home | Read News | Post News | Read Articles | Write Articles | Q & A | Groups | Activity | Members | More
Privacy Policy | House Rules | About Us | Contact Us | House Blog | FAQ | Advertise With Us
© Copyright 2007 Gooruze ™ | Built by Market United