MarcHausman

Public relations professionals are challenged with information overload.  To provide proper context and counsel, we must understand the macro trends shaping a myriad of industry segments, the strategies of market leaders and emerging vendors, and how our company fits into the mix.

The social media era has made the content tsunami worse.  Personally, I’ve added a host of blogs, Twitter feeds and LinkedIn group discussions to the periodicals and journals I read on a weekly basis.

Yet, regardless of how many blogs I add to my Google Reader I still consider trade publications like Computerworld, InfoWorld, CIO, Network World and Informationweek a must read.  Their writers know the markets they cover better than general business journalists, and they tend to provide reliable and well researched insight and analysis.

In fact, I have had editors at mainstream outlets like BusinessWeek, the Wall Street Journal and Forbes ask me to send a client’s trade clips before they would seriously entertain developing a story about the company.  You had to prove the client was the talk of its industry because the trade media typically sniffed out companies that lacked substance.

Based on a new survey (http://www.gwu.edu/~newsctr/newscenter/research/Cision/index.cfm) I just reviewed, I may need to rethink my reading priorities.  George Washington University professor Don Bates got together with Cision to query 12,000 reporters and editors about the outside sources they rely on for story ideas and research.

The results of the survey are comprehensive and cover a number of important topics.  I’ll focus on the unexpected knocks on trade publications, which included:

--Blogs are used almost as often as trades as part of the reporting and editing process.

--For monitoring responses to stories, only Web sites and blogs are considered important.  Conferences, trade journals, social networking sites and podcasts are lumped in the unimportant category.

Okay…what’s going on here?  I know the trades have suffered due to a decrease in advertising and the lack of a viable Web business model.  The resulting cut-backs have taken out many experienced writers who toiled for years to develop the expertise and contacts to effectively report on the most technical industries.   

For the trade media to have fallen on par (and even lower) with the mass of peer review-less hacks who together comprise a significant portion of the blogosphere represents a shocking decline in their influence. 

If journalists no longer turn to the trades for what is relevant in a specific market should I spend my time with them every week?  And, of course, the bigger question is:  Will the trades even be viable in the next 18 to 24 months?