 |  | |||
|
18 Mar This post is from from my other blog here A post this morning on Sphinn really got my fire going… Apparently, there is a document floating around out there that is supposedly a set of guidelines for the search quality team at Google. Whether it’s legit or not, you can tell that someone put a lot of thought into it, and I think even Matt Cutts himself would have a hard time arguing with anything there. The entire 43 page document keeps referring to the simple fact fact that a site has to offer added value, or it’s spam. While I certainly can’t say whether it’s from Google, I can’t imagine ...
| ||||
 |  |
by 
